BP Energy sued for attempting to force prices higher through contracts

Nashville, TN – A smaller gas company was successful in its breach of contract lawsuit against energy giant BP for forcing prices higher [1].

Energy companies involved in breach of contract lawsuits

In a significant legal victory, Arkansas Oklahoma Gas (AOG) emerged triumphant in its breach of contract lawsuit against the BP Energy Company. The lawsuit, initiated by AOG in 2021, centered on BP’s alleged failure to deliver the agreed-upon quantity of natural gas units during the severe winter storm that swept through parts of the southern United States in February 2021.

AOG’s contention was that BP’s inability to fulfill the contractual obligations forced the company to procure gas from alternative sources at substantially higher prices. Consequently, the increased expenditure incurred by AOG was passed on to its customers through elevated monthly bills.

The outcome of the lawsuit, with AOG securing an $18 million verdict in its favor, represents a significant relief for both the company and its customers. The successful litigation not only vindicates AOG’s claims of contractual breach by BP but also serves as a financial respite for its customers. With the $18 million awarded to AOG, there is a tangible reduction in the financial burden that customers would have otherwise borne in the aftermath of the winter storm.

This legal victory underscores the importance of upholding contractual obligations in the energy sector and reaffirms the principle that companies must be held accountable for their commitments. In this case, AOG’s diligence in pursuing its breach of contract claims has resulted in a favorable outcome that will ultimately benefit its customers by mitigating the impact of higher gas prices on their monthly bills.

Are businesses allowed to create contracts that force prices higher?

Businesses typically have a degree of flexibility in negotiating and forming contracts, but there are important legal and ethical constraints that prevent them from creating contracts that unreasonably or unlawfully force prices higher. The ability of businesses to set contract terms and prices is subject to various laws and regulations that aim to maintain fair competition and protect consumers. Here’s a breakdown of the key factors involved in this matter:

  • Antitrust Laws: In many countries, including the United States, there are antitrust laws in place to prevent anti-competitive behavior. These laws prohibit practices that could lead to monopolies, collusion, price-fixing, or any other actions that could harm fair competition. Businesses are not allowed to enter into contracts that would restrict competition, raise prices artificially, or limit consumer choices.
  • Unconscionable Contracts: Courts can invalidate contracts that are deemed unconscionable, which means they are so one-sided and unfair that they shock the conscience. If a contract is found to be unconscionable, it may be voided, and the terms may not be enforced.
  • Consumer Protection Laws: In many jurisdictions, there are specific laws that protect consumers from unfair and deceptive business practices. These laws often require businesses to provide clear and accurate information to consumers about prices, terms, and conditions. Contracts that violate consumer protection laws may be unenforceable.
  • Price Gouging Laws: During emergencies or crises, some jurisdictions have price gouging laws that prevent businesses from significantly increasing prices for essential goods and services. These laws aim to protect consumers from exploitation during times of need.
  • Competitive Market Forces: Even without specific laws, businesses must consider market dynamics. In competitive markets, if a business attempts to force prices unreasonably high, it may lose customers to competitors offering more reasonable prices.
  • Contractual Agreements: Contracts are generally agreements between willing parties. If both parties willingly agree to certain pricing terms and conditions, and these terms are legal and not unconscionable, the contract is typically enforceable. However, this doesn’t mean businesses can engage in illegal or anti-competitive practices through contracts.
  • Regulatory Oversight: Certain industries, such as utilities, healthcare, and financial services, are subject to specific regulations that may limit how businesses can set prices and contract terms. Regulatory bodies oversee these industries to ensure prices are fair and services are provided equitably.

In summary, while businesses have some latitude in setting contract terms and prices, they are not allowed to create contracts that unreasonably or unlawfully force prices higher. Legal and ethical considerations, as well as the presence of laws and regulations designed to protect consumers and maintain fair competition, place limits on what businesses can do in their contracts. Businesses must navigate a complex landscape to ensure their contracts are both legally sound and ethically responsible, taking into account the rights and interests of their customers and competitors. Violations of these principles can lead to legal consequences, including contract nullification and potential fines or penalties.

Advice from a business attorney in Nashville

The Law Office of George R. Fusner is a firm that handles various business matters for local clients in the Nashville area. 

USAttorneys.com is a service that works with people who need to find lawyers. Those who need assistance with a referral can call 800-672-3103

Firm contact info:

The Law Office of George R. Fusner

7104 Peach Court, Brentwood TN 37027





  1. https://www.nwahomepage.com/news/aog-wins-breach-of-contract-lawsuit-against-bp/
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *