Is the Brightline train company responsible for recent accidents in Florida?
West Palm Beach, FL – There were reports with the details of a recent fatal car accident involving a man from North Palm Beach, FL [1].
Evidence suggests victim drove through closed railroad crossing
On August 8, 2024, Duane Stuart Matheson, a 68-year-old North Palm Beach resident, died after his car was struck by a Brightline train in Lake Park. According to the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office, Matheson was driving a 2001 Mercury Sable east on Northlake Boulevard around 3 p.m. when he approached a railroad crossing near Alternate A1A. At the time, the safety lights were flashing, and the crossing arms were down to prevent vehicles from crossing.
For reasons that remain unclear, Matheson drove under the lowered safety arm and into the path of a southbound Brightline train. The collision occurred with the first passenger carriage of the train, propelling Matheson’s car to the southwest. The car then traveled down an embankment, overturning and landing on its roof. Matheson was pronounced dead at the scene.
This incident is part of a troubling pattern, as Brightline trains have been involved in over 30 fatal accidents in Palm Beach County since the rail service began in 2018. Despite significant investments in safety measures—such as warning signs, electric signals, and public awareness campaigns—the frequency of such tragic accidents highlights ongoing challenges with train crossings in the area. The Brightline service, which extends from Miami to Orlando, runs on tracks that intersect several roads with limited natural barriers, contributing to the risk of collisions.
Who is liable for a train accident when a car illegally goes through a railroad crossing?
Determining liability in train accidents involving cars that illegally cross railroad tracks involves multiple factors, including the actions of the driver, the state of the railroad crossing, and the potential responsibility of the train operator. Here’s an overview of the key considerations:
- Driver’s Responsibility: When a vehicle illegally crosses a railroad track, the driver typically bears a significant portion of the liability. Railroad crossings are equipped with safety mechanisms such as flashing lights, crossing gates, and warning signs to prevent vehicles from entering the tracks when a train is approaching. If a driver bypasses these safety measures, their actions are considered negligent. In legal terms, negligence refers to the failure to exercise reasonable care, which in this case involves ignoring the warning systems designed to protect drivers and passengers from collisions with trains.
- Railroad Crossing Maintenance: The responsibility for maintaining and operating crossing signals and gates generally falls on the railroad company or the relevant government agency. If these safety mechanisms are malfunctioning or not properly maintained, the railroad could be held partially liable. For instance, if a crossing gate fails to lower properly or warning lights do not activate, the railroad could be found negligent for not maintaining the equipment in proper working order.
- Train Operator’s Actions: Train operators are required to follow safety protocols, which include maintaining a vigilant watch for potential obstacles and adhering to speed limits. However, if a train was operating within legal parameters and the collision occurred due to the driver’s illegal crossing, the train operator typically bears less liability. However, if the train was traveling at excessive speeds or the operator failed to sound the horn appropriately when approaching the crossing, there could be an argument for shared liability.
- Legal Precedents and Regulations: Legal precedents and state regulations also play a role in determining liability. Courts often examine the specifics of each case, including the condition of the crossing, the actions of both the driver and the train operator, and any contributory factors. In some jurisdictions, comparative negligence rules apply, where fault is divided among parties based on their degree of responsibility.
- Insurance and Compensation: In cases where a driver is found at fault, their insurance may cover damages, but this often depends on the driver’s coverage and the extent of liability. Railroad companies also carry insurance to cover damages resulting from accidents, but they typically contest liability if the driver ignored safety measures.
In summary, while the driver who illegally crosses a railroad track is generally held primarily responsible, the liability for a train accident can be complex, involving the maintenance of safety equipment, the actions of the train operator, and the specifics of legal and insurance frameworks.
Accident attorneys in West Palm Beach
Smith and Vanture is an auto accident and personal injury firm in Florida that has experience with personal injury cases. Their attorneys can provide more advice following any motor vehicle collision or other accidents.
USAttorneys.com is a service that works with people who are trying to find attorneys in their city or state. Anyone who needs assistance with their search can call 800-672-3103
Firm contact info:
580 Village Blvd. Suite 200, West Palm Beach, FL 33409
561-684-6330
Smithvanture.com
Sources:
- https://www.aol.com/pbso-man-68-drove-under-184001859.html
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!