We are employment lawyers that have obtained over $1.3 billion settlements and judgments
Call 877-852-3912 For a Free Consultation About California Employment Law Rights.
At Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhowmik, our attorneys know how to maximize the amount of relief employees recover for their current or former employers illegal pay practices, as our settlements and judgments of over $1.3 billion on behalf of employees and consumers indicates. Our ability to effectively represent workers throughout the state in employment lawsuits derives from two qualities that differentiate us from other.
Our Labor Attorneys are Experienced and Our Firm has a Proven Track Record of Success. We have extensive experience representing California workers in wage and hour claims to collect such things as unpaid overtime wages, unpaid straight time, missed meal and rest breaks, work-related expenses, vacation time, or any other type of benefit an employee may earn through the performance of labor. Our attorneys apply cutting edge litigation techniques and strategies for our clients, which is why we have experienced success in moving cases through the court systems as quickly as possible while simultaneously remaining aggressive and effective.
Our Employment Law Firm has the resources to help California employees fight back against Fortune 500 Companies.
In addition to giving all employees free consultations, we litigate individual and class action cases on a contingency basis, meaning you never pay our lawyers unless we recover money for you. What's more, we usually front all of the litigation costs to make it easier on our clients to vindicate their rights. At Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhowmik, our experienced employment law lawyers represent workers throughout the entire state of California, including Los Angeles, San Diego, Orange County, Santa Clara, San Francisco and Sacramento. We have an impressive record of successfully litigating overtime wage cases in federal courts, such as the District Courts for the Central District of California, Northern District of California, and Southern District of California.
We invite you to learn more about attorneys by visiting the links to their individual attorney profile pages below. Contact our office to schedule a free consultation. We represent workers in individual and class action lawsuits on a contingency basis in San Diego, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Orange County, Santa Clara and throughout California.
Firm's reported cases: In Re Bank of America Wage and Hour Employment Litigation, 2010 WL 4180530 (D.Kan. 2010); Kennedy v. Natural Balance Pet Foods, Inc., 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 248 (9th Cir. 2010); In Re Bank of America Wage and Hour Employment Litigation, 2010 WL 3833034 (D.Kan. 2010); Keshishzadeh v. Gallagher, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46805 (S.D. Cal. 2010); Steroid Hormone Product Cases, 181 Cal. App. 4th 145 (2010); Weltman v. Ortho Mattress, Inc., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20521 (S.D. Cal. 2010); Weston v. FedEx Office & Print Servs., 707 F. Supp. 2d 1074 (S.D. Cal. 2010); Sussex v. Turnberry/MGM Grand Towers, LLC, 2010 WL 3171121 (D. Nev. 2010); Reynolds v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 332 Fed. Appx. 397 (2009); Owen v. Macy's, Inc., 175 Cal. App. 4th 462 (2009); Sussex v. Turnberry/MGM Grand Towers, LLC, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29503 (D. Nev. 2009); Picus v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 256 F.R.D. 651 (D. Nev. 2009); Tull v. Stewart Title of Cal., Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14171 (S.D. Cal. 2009); McPhail v. First Command Fin. Planning, Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26544 (S.D. Cal. 2009); Barcia v. Contain-A-Way, Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17118 (S.D. Cal. 2009); Wise v. Cubic Def. Applications, Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11225 (S.D. Cal. 2009); Gabisan v. Pelican Prods., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1391 (S.D. Cal. 2009); Yoshi v. FedEx, 2009 U.S. Dist. Ct. Pleadings 812138 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2009); La Jolla Friends of the Seals v. Nat'l Oceanic & Atmospheric Admin., 630 F. Supp. 2d 1222 (S.D. Cal. 2009); In re Pet Food Prods. Liab. Litig., MDL Docket No. 1850 (All Cases), 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94603 (D.N.J. 2008); Silvas v. E*Trade Mortg. Corp., 514 F.3d 1001 (9th Cir. 2008); REYNOLDS v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., 2008 U.S. 9th Cir. Briefs 55114 (9th Cir. May 21, 2008); Bova v. Washington Mut. Bank, 2008 WL 4791833 (S.D. Cal 2008); Delmare v. Sungard Higher Educ., Inc. 2008 WL 2227531 S.D.Cal. (2008); Gruender v. First American Title Co., 2008 WL 2936823 (Cal. Superior 2008); La Jolla Friends of the Seals v. Nat'l Oceanic & Atmospheric Admin. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102380 (S.D. Cal. 2008); Louie v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78314 (S.D. Cal. 2008); Weltman v. Ortho Mattress, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60344 (S.D. Cal. 2008); Barcia v. Contain-A-Way, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27365 (S.D. Cal. 2008); Puentes v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., 160 Cal. App. 4th 638 (2008); McPhail v. First Command Fin. Planning, Inc., 251 F.R.D. 514 (S.D. Cal. 2008); Kennedy v. Natural Balance Pet Foods, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38889 (S.D. Cal. 2008); Schiff Food Products Co. v. Perez, 2007 WL 4510156 (Cal.App. 4 Dist. 2007); In re Tobacco Cases II, 41 Cal. 4th 1257 (2007); PCO, Inc. v. Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & Shapiro, LLP, 150 Cal. App. 4th 384 (2007); Hall v. County of Los Angeles, 148 Cal. App. 4th 318 (2007); Kennedy v. Natural Balance Pet Foods, Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57766 (S.D. Cal. 2007); McPhail v. First Command Fin. Planning, Inc., 247 F.R.D. 598 (S.D. Cal. 2007); Reynov v. ADP Claims Servs. Group, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94332 (N.D. Cal. 2006); Rocker v. KPMG LLP, 122 Nev. 1185 (2006); Silvas v. E*Trade Mortg. Corp., 421 F. Supp. 2d 1315 (S.D. Cal. 2006); Meco v. Novaspes, Inc., 2006 WL 93245 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. 2006); Connel vs. Sun Microsystems, Inc., 2006 WL 4088315 (2006); Curry v. CTB McGraw-Hill, LLC, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5920; 97 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1888; 37 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2390 (N.D. Cal. 2006); Coshow v. City of Escondido, 132 Cal. App. 4th 687 (2005); In re Tobacco Cases II, 20 Cal.Rptr.3d 693 (Cal.App. 4 Dist. 2004); Taiheiyo Cement Corp. v. Superior Court, 117 Cal. App. 4th 380 (2004); Rezec v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc., 116 Cal. App. 4th 135 (2004); Briseno v. American Sav. Bank, 2004 WL 5561659 (Cal.Superior 2004); Taiheiyo Cement Corp. v. Superior Court, 105 Cal.App. 4th 398 (2003); Gibson v. World Savings & Loan Asso., 103 Cal. App. 4th 1291 (2003); Delaney v. Warner-Lambert Co., 2003 WL 1548691 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. 2003); Olszewski v. Scripps Health, 30 Cal. 4th 798 (2003); In re Vesta Ins. Group Securities Litigation, 2002 WL 34248002 (N.D. Ala. 2002); Gibson v. World Savings & Loan Assn., 128 Cal.Rptr.2d 19 (Cal. App. 4th 2002); McMeans v. Scripps Health, Inc., 100 Cal. App. 4th 507 (2002); Jordan v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 100 Cal. App. 4th 431 (2002); Badillo v. Am. Tobacco Co., 202 F.R.D. 261 (D. Nev. 2001); Washington Mutual Bank v. Superior Court, 24 Cal. 4th 906 (2001); Ramos v. Countrywide Home Loans, 82 Cal.App. 4th 615 (2000); Tevssier v. City of San Diego, 81 Cal.App. 4th 685 (2000); Washington Mutual Bank v. Superior Court, 70 Cal. App. 4th 299 (1999); Jordan v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 75 Cal. App. 4th 445 (1999); Norwest Mortgage, Inc. v. Superior Court, 72 Cal.App.4th 214 (1999); Kensington Capital Mgal. v. Oakley, Inc., 1999 U.S. Dist LEXIS 385; Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P90, 411 (1999 C.D. Cal.); Lister v. Oakley, Inc., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 384; Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P90, 409 (C.D Cal. 1999); Hildago v. Diversified Transp. Sya, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 3207 (9th Cir. 1998); Daniels v. Philip Morris, 18 F.Supp 2d 1110, 1998 WL 564708 (S.D. Cal.1998).
