In the realm of San Diego car accident lawyer, several legal principles govern how cases are handled and compensation is awarded. A significant rule in these cases is the principle of Pure Comparative Negligence, a statute that directly influences the determination of fault and the allocation of damages in car accidents.
Understanding California’s Pure Comparative Negligence Law
Under California’s Civil Code Section 1714, every person is responsible for the result of their willful acts, and for an injury caused to another due to a lack of ordinary care or skill in the management of their property or person. To apply this principle in car accident cases, California follows the Pure Comparative Negligence rule.
According to this rule, each party involved in an accident can bear a certain degree of fault. Even if you are found to be 99% at fault for a car accident, you can still recover 1% of the total damages from the other party. In other words, any awarded compensation is reduced by a percentage equal to your share of the blame, but you can recover damages regardless of your degree of fault.
Implications of the Pure Comparative Negligence Rule
The Pure Comparative Negligence rule has a considerable impact on car accident cases in several ways:
Allocation of Fault: This rule acknowledges that fault can be shared among multiple parties in an accident. It assigns each party a percentage of fault, ensuring that everyone is held accountable for their actions.
Reduction of Damages: The rule can reduce the amount of compensation an injured party can recover, proportionate to their degree of fault. For instance, if you are awarded $100,000 in damages but were found to be 25% at fault, you would receive $75,000.
Recovery of Damages: Unique to the pure comparative negligence rule, even if an injured party is mostly at fault, they can still recover some damages.
Given the potential influence of the Pure Comparative Negligence rule on a car accident case, understanding this law is crucial when pursuing a claim. Proving fault, collecting evidence, and defending your rights can be complicated tasks that require a deep understanding of the law.
An experienced car accident attorney in San Diego can be a valuable asset in such cases. They can help clarify how the Pure Comparative Negligence law applies to your case, gather necessary evidence, and argue effectively to minimize your degree of fault and maximize your compensation.
In conclusion, California’s Pure Comparative Negligence law is a critical statute in car accident cases in San Diego. This law plays a significant role in determining liability and allocating damages in car accidents. Although it introduces a level of complexity to car accident cases, understanding this law can make a significant difference in the outcome of your case. While this article provides a general overview of the law, every situation is unique and can present its own set of challenges. Hence, consulting with a seasoned attorney is crucial as they can provide personalized advice, tailored to your specific circumstances, and ensure your rights are upheld as you navigate your way towards achieving the justice you deserve.
Get in touch with a truck accident lawyer at Jeffery Eyestes Injury Lawyers today.
Reach them at:
Address:80300 Via Valerosa, Indio, CA 92253
SAN DIEGO OFFICE
Address: 501 West Broadway, Suite 1650 San Diego, CA 92101
- JOLLA OFFICE
Address: 864 Prospect Street, Suite C, La Jolla, CA 92037